Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$97,897.00 0.4278
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,689.21 -1.61515
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$684.44 -1.80655
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$221.01 1.60115
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$2.34 5.06975
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000272 0.37801
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000233 -9.70565
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000366 -4.53837
Bonk price
dogwifhat
dogwifhat (WIF)
$2.94 -0.99216
dogwifhat price
Popcat
Popcat (POPCAT)
$1.23 4.95452
Popcat price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$97,897.00 0.4278
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,689.21 -1.61515
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$684.44 -1.80655
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$221.01 1.60115
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$2.34 5.06975
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000272 0.37801
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000233 -9.70565
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000366 -4.53837
Bonk price
dogwifhat
dogwifhat (WIF)
$2.94 -0.99216
dogwifhat price
Popcat
Popcat (POPCAT)
$1.23 4.95452
Popcat price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$97,897.00 0.4278
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,689.21 -1.61515
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$684.44 -1.80655
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$221.01 1.60115
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$2.34 5.06975
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000272 0.37801
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000233 -9.70565
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000366 -4.53837
Bonk price
dogwifhat
dogwifhat (WIF)
$2.94 -0.99216
dogwifhat price
Popcat
Popcat (POPCAT)
$1.23 4.95452
Popcat price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$97,897.00 0.4278
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,689.21 -1.61515
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$684.44 -1.80655
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$221.01 1.60115
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$2.34 5.06975
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000272 0.37801
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000233 -9.70565
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000366 -4.53837
Bonk price
dogwifhat
dogwifhat (WIF)
$2.94 -0.99216
dogwifhat price
Popcat
Popcat (POPCAT)
$1.23 4.95452
Popcat price

Tens of billions in stablecoin transactions ‘inorganic,’ Visa says

tens-of-billions-in-stablecoin-transactions-inorganic-visa-says
Edited by
News
Tens of billions in stablecoin transactions ‘inorganic,’ Visa says

International payment giant Visa has unveiled a new study challenging the assumption that stablecoin turnover is approaching levels seen in traditional payment networks.

Visa, a global payment network, has raised concerns about the reliability of stablecoin transactions, opposing the common belief that they are becoming as popular as traditional money networks.

Cuy Sheffield, Visa’s head of crypto, suggested in a recent X thread that a significant portion of stablecoin transactions across many blockchain networks are influenced by “a lot of noise,” mainly due to automated bot activities.

Visa’s methodology of differentiating between stablecoin transactions relies on two metrics. Firstly, it focuses only on the largest stablecoin amount transferred within a single transaction, excluding smaller transactions resulting from complex smart contract interactions.

Tens of billions in stablecoin transactions 'inorganic,' Visa says - 1
Visa’s research on stablecoin activity | Source: Visa

Secondly, it employs an “inorganic user filter,” targeting transactions initiated by accounts engaging in fewer than 1,000 stablecoin transactions and $10 million in transfer volume.

“This removes various bot activity as well as automatic transactions from large entities like centralized exchanges.”

Visa

In a commentary to Bloomberg, Pranav Sood, executive general manager for EMEA at payments platform Airwallex, noted that data says that stablecoins “are still in a very nascent moment in their evolution as a payment instrument,” adding that in the short-term and the mid-term, the market should focus on “making sure that existing rails work much better.”

However, not everyone in the cryptocurrency market agrees with Visa’s findings, questioning their methodology. Nick van Eck, co-founder of Agora, a startup specializing in stablecoins, said in a statement to DL News that the data “makes no sense because then it would factor in trading firms, which are entirely legitimate businesses using these products.”