Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$97,362.00 4.92209
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,134.98 0.64086
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$612.72 -0.19966
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$240.50 2.00373
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$1.11 1.87908
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000242 -1.18046
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000194 -4.70955
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000528 -5.20208
Bonk price
dogwifhat
dogwifhat (WIF)
$3.19 -4.54452
dogwifhat price
Popcat
Popcat (POPCAT)
$1.55 -10.88136
Popcat price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$97,362.00 4.92209
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,134.98 0.64086
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$612.72 -0.19966
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$240.50 2.00373
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$1.11 1.87908
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000242 -1.18046
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000194 -4.70955
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000528 -5.20208
Bonk price
dogwifhat
dogwifhat (WIF)
$3.19 -4.54452
dogwifhat price
Popcat
Popcat (POPCAT)
$1.55 -10.88136
Popcat price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$97,362.00 4.92209
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,134.98 0.64086
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$612.72 -0.19966
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$240.50 2.00373
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$1.11 1.87908
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000242 -1.18046
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000194 -4.70955
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000528 -5.20208
Bonk price
dogwifhat
dogwifhat (WIF)
$3.19 -4.54452
dogwifhat price
Popcat
Popcat (POPCAT)
$1.55 -10.88136
Popcat price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$97,362.00 4.92209
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,134.98 0.64086
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$612.72 -0.19966
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$240.50 2.00373
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$1.11 1.87908
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000242 -1.18046
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000194 -4.70955
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000528 -5.20208
Bonk price
dogwifhat
dogwifhat (WIF)
$3.19 -4.54452
dogwifhat price
Popcat
Popcat (POPCAT)
$1.55 -10.88136
Popcat price

WazirX hacker launders over $64m, insider involvement suspected

wazirx-hacker-launders-over-64m-insider-involvement-suspected
Edited by
News
WazirX hacker launders over $64m, insider involvement suspected

The WazirX exploiter has laundered over $64 million via Tornado Cash, as allegations of insider involvement have surfaced.

According to PeckShieldAlert, on Sep. 13 the WazirX hacker moved 5,000 ETH, roughly $11.8 million, to a new address before laundering the stolen loot via cryptocurrency mixer Tornado Cash in a bid to obscure the trail.

With this latest transaction, the attacker has laundered about 27,600 ETH, valued at approximately $64.97 million, over the past weeks.

As the attacker moved the funds, reports surfaced alleging possible insider involvement in the $230 million breach that crippled what was once India’s biggest cryptocurrency exchange.

What are the allegations? 

An X account named Justice for WazirX Users, citing unnamed sources and data from a First Information Report filed with the Delhi Police, pointed out some unusual activities at the exchange before the hack.

The allegations claim the attacker used fake KYC information to open a WazirX account and deposited cryptocurrency, which was traded for GALA tokens.

On July 18, the day of the breach, the hacker began withdrawing GALA tokens, which caused the depletion of WazirX’s hot wallet. This forced the exchange to transfer additional GALA tokens from cold storage, managed by its former custodian Liminal, to replenish the hot wallet.

During this process, the hacker allegedly injected malicious code, causing the transfer of tokens from cold to hot storage to fail. As subsequent attempts were made by cold storage signatories to move the funds the attacker managed to swipe their credentials in the process. 

Having obtained the necessary signatures, the attacker allegedly used the WazirX team’s login session to initiate a final transaction on Liminal’s platform that upgraded the WazirX cold wallet contract, which ultimately led to the breach.

“Once these 3 signatures were submitted to Liminal, they provided the final 4th signature, allowing the contract to be upgraded,” JfWU added.

An analysis by Crystal Intelligence confirmed that the laptops of key personnel used for signing transactions were not compromised. A separate audit of Liminal’s system by Grant Thornton also found no evidence of a custodial breach, leading to more confusion.

JfWU argued that modifying the cold wallet’s smart contract would have been difficult without insider cooperation, raising suspicions of internal involvement.

The allegations are yet to be confirmed, but both JfWU and several WazirX customers are urging the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Enforcement Directorate to conduct a thorough investigation into the case.

WazirX’s restructuring attempt faces hiccups

Amidst this chaos, WazirX’s restructuring process, announced on Aug. 28, is facing hurdles as the exchange seeks customer support for a moratorium application under Singapore’s insolvency laws to secure approval from the Singapore court. 

However, the process hit a stumbling block as users expressed frustration over a poll that initially offered only a “Yes” option to support the application. On Sept. 12, following the backlash, WazirX management expanded the poll to include “No” and “No Position” options, allowing users to voice their opposition or remain neutral on the matter.

A Sept. 10 affidavit obtained by crypto.news showed that just 441 of WazirX’s 4.4 million users had come out in support of the proposal. A subsequent affidavit confirmed that a hearing on the moratorium application is set for Sept. 25, 2024, in the Singapore High Court.