Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$63,665.00 1.58804
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$2,472.25 1.33005
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$575.65 1.51756
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$148.82 2.3965
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$0.5426 1.60773
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000182 -1.01685
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000106 3.58938
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000226 3.56165
Bonk price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$63,665.00 1.58804
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$2,472.25 1.33005
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$575.65 1.51756
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$148.82 2.3965
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$0.5426 1.60773
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000182 -1.01685
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000106 3.58938
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000226 3.56165
Bonk price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$63,665.00 1.58804
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$2,472.25 1.33005
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$575.65 1.51756
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$148.82 2.3965
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$0.5426 1.60773
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000182 -1.01685
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000106 3.58938
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000226 3.56165
Bonk price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$63,665.00 1.58804
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$2,472.25 1.33005
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$575.65 1.51756
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$148.82 2.3965
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$0.5426 1.60773
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000182 -1.01685
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000106 3.58938
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000226 3.56165
Bonk price

Binance.US hit with regulatory setbacks in Florida and Alaska

binance-us-hit-regulatory-setback-florida-and-alaska
Edited by
News
Binance.US hit with regulatory setbacks in Florida and Alaska

Crypto exchange platform Binance.US faces ongoing challenges intensified by regulatory scrutiny, especially in Florida and Alaska, where its operations have been suspended.

Alaska and Florida regulators deliver blows to Binance.US

The Florida Office of Financial Regulation recently decided against Binance. US, known as BAM Trading under section 120.60(6) of the Florida statutes.

This permits immediate suspension in case an operation is threatening public health, safety or welfare. The suspension seeks to protect the public’s interests as a result of findings that BAM Trading works posed an immediate danger.

Binance.US has experienced challenges with regulatory issues in Alaska, as its banking division rejected license renewal for reasons not known yet. 

These actions underscore the regulators’ increasing scrutiny and commitment to enforcing compliance within the U.S. cryptocurrency market.

The regulatory hurdles in Alaska and Florida are part of a broader crackdown on Binance.US. The leadership changes and criminal charges against former CEO Changpeng Zhao add complexity to the company’s regulatory landscape. Navigating these challenges becomes crucial for Binance.US, necessitating the need for collaboration with regulators to address raised concerns.

Bitcoin (BTC) scheme settlement in Florida

In July 2023, two individuals from Florida settled charges brought by the CFTC, paying over $5 million in restitution.

The US derivatives market regulator accused them of digital asset fraud, deceiving investors, and swindling funds intended for Bitcoin (BTC) purchases in 2018. Prohibited from trading or registering with the CFTC, this case reflects the increasing vigilance in the US regulatory environment.

Tax strategies and Binance safety review

In May 2023, Glassnode highlighted some areas where crypto investors can minimize tax liabilities, including relocation to tax-friendly states. The analysis pointed out that states such as Alaska, Florida, Nevada South, Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming, having no income tax, offer good options for wealth preservation.

To ensure user safety, a noteworthy development occurred in August 2022. Binance U.S. Consumer Safety files were requested for review by a U.S. Congressman.

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s subcommittee chair sought official documents demonstrating the firm’s compliance with investor-centric safety procedures, indicating a keen interest in securing user interests.