Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$66,483.00 3.64241
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,499.15 2.21829
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$590.48 3.24438
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$169.48 5.16479
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$0.5868030 5.95721
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000178 1.75942
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000123 5.82491
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000318 19.52217
Bonk price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$66,483.00 3.64241
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,499.15 2.21829
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$590.48 3.24438
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$169.48 5.16479
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$0.5868030 5.95721
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000178 1.75942
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000123 5.82491
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000318 19.52217
Bonk price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$66,483.00 3.64241
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,499.15 2.21829
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$590.48 3.24438
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$169.48 5.16479
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$0.5868030 5.95721
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000178 1.75942
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000123 5.82491
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000318 19.52217
Bonk price
Bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC)
$66,483.00 3.64241
Bitcoin price
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH)
$3,499.15 2.21829
Ethereum price
BNB
BNB (BNB)
$590.48 3.24438
BNB price
Solana
Solana (SOL)
$169.48 5.16479
Solana price
XRP
XRP (XRP)
$0.5868030 5.95721
XRP price
Shiba Inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB)
$0.0000178 1.75942
Shiba Inu price
Pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.0000123 5.82491
Pepe price
Bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.0000318 19.52217
Bonk price

Crypto lending protocol Geist Finances ceases operations after Multichain shutdown

News
Crypto lending protocol Geist Finances ceases operations after Multichain shutdown

Geist Finance has decided not to reopen after Multichain’s confirmation that the funds will remain unrecoverable.

The unavailability of accurate valuation for Multichain assets due to the Chainlink oracles tracking real USDC, USDT, WBTC, or ETH values, has further contributed to this outcome.

Resume borrowing activities

Geist, a lending protocol operating on the Fantom (FTM) network, had over $29 million worth of cryptocurrency assets locked in its contracts before the Multichain hack. The platform allowed users to utilize bridged tokens from Multichain, such as USD coin (USDC), tether (USDT), bitcoin (BTC), and ethereum (ETH), as collateral for borrowing and lending, with Chainlink oracles used to track their prices for valuation.

However, the recent post from Geist revealed that the Chainlink oracles no longer provide reliable information. Instead of reflecting the values of the Multichain derivatives, the oracles list the prices of each coin’s non-bridged, or “real,” versions, which are over four times higher than the Multichain assets’ value.

This discrepancy arises because the Chainlink oracles are unaware of the actual worth of the Multichain assets, as they are currently trading at approximately 22% of their real value.

The result of a hack

In an update on July 14, the Multichain team confirmed that the recent withdrawals, which occurred on July 7, were the result of a hack. It was revealed that all the shards of the network’s private keys had been stored in a “cloud server account” under the exclusive control of the team’s CEO, who had been arrested by Chinese authorities.

Unauthorized access to this cloud server account allowed an individual to drain funds from the protocol. It is important to note that the protocol’s documents had previously stated that no single server had access to all the shards of a key.

Additionally, the post stated that the fee-based attack on July 11 was a counter-exploit initiated by the CEO’s sister, acting upon the Multichain team’s instructions to recover the funds. However, the sister was also arrested, and the status of the assets she managed to retrieve remains uncertain.

Arcadia Finance, a decentralized finance (defi) protocol, suffered a substantial loss of around $455,000 due to a code exploit. The breach was initially identified and disclosed by PeckShield, a blockchain security firm, which traced the incident back to a coding error related to untrusted input validation.