Sam Bankman-Fried’s list of ‘random probably bad ideas’ included a Tucker Carlson Q&A
Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced founder of the collapsed FTX crypto exchange, seemingly intended to rehabilitate his image by appearing on Tucker Carlson’s show and criticizing the “woke agenda.”
On March 15, a Google Document titled “random probably bad ideas” surfaced as part of Bankman-Fried’s prosecutors’ sentencing submission.
Bankman-Fried’s lawyers, meanwhile, are advocating for a 50-year prison sentence as opposed to the maximum sentence of 115 years in prison.
With a 50-year sentence, Bankman-Fried would be 82 years old at the time of release.
Noteworthy among the suggestions on Bankman-Fried’s list of “random” ideas was the proposal to sit for an interview with former Fox broadcaster Tucker Carlson and publicly declare his affiliation with the U.S. Republican political party.
Bankman-Fried intended to leverage this opportunity as a way to critique the bankruptcy lawyers overseeing FTX’s fraud case and to voice his dislike of the “woke agenda.”
Bankman-Fried never appeared on Carlson’s show, which Fox News canceled in 2023.
Per the leaked document, Bankman-Fried conveyed a stark assessment, stating, “Discuss how the consortium of attorneys is eroding value and sacrificing entrepreneurs to mask the ineptitude of legal practitioners.”
The document cautions that the ideas expressed therein are unverified and potentially flawed. Bankman-Fried articulated his views in one list entry, expressing a clear focus on restoring value to customers while condemning the Chapter 11 team’s actions as detrimental.
In another entry, he criticized the team’s incompetence in managing the FTX case, characterizing it as colonial and dominated by a cabal of lawyers.
Other entries highlighted his advocacy for crypto and freedom, as well as a desire to engage in debates, including with Matt Levine, a Bloomberg financial journalist, who critiqued the defense strategy as being overly complex and potentially ineffective.
Following Bankman-Fried’s indictment on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy in November 2022, he was convicted of embezzling $8 billion from clients of the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX.
Prosecutors pushed for a 50-year prison sentence and an $11 billion judgment, effectively labeling his fraud as one of the largest in history.
Since his incarceration, Bankman-Fried’s conduct has drawn scrutiny. Reports surfaced in February indicating his provision of cryptocurrency investment advice to prison guards at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, signaling a departure from his earlier prison activities, such as trading canned mackerels as currency.
SBF’s future uncertain
Bankman-Fried’s sentencing is scheduled for March 28. He intends to appeal his conviction.
Prosecutors argue that his actions inflicted substantial financial harm on over a million victims, warranting a lengthy prison term.
On Feb. 28, Bankman-Fried’s lawyer advocated for a lenient sentence, emphasizing that most funds would be returned to the affected customers.
The lawyer, Marc Mukasey, suggested a prison term ranging between 5-1/4 and 6-1/2 years to U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who is scheduled to deliver the sentence on March 28.
Bankman-Fried’s psychiatrist and his Stanford law professor-parents, Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, also submitted letters of support stating that their son was uninterested in material wealth.
Bankman-Fried is a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and worked at Wall Street before riding a boom in the values of digital assets such as Bitcoin (BTC).
His net worth — once estimated to be $16 billion — vanished when FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022 following a series of customer withdrawals.
The decision now lies with U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who is tasked with weighing the conflicting recommendations to determine the appropriate sentence.
This case underscores the intricacies of white-collar crime sentencing and the delicate balance between accountability, rehabilitation, and the impact of criminal actions on victims.
The outcome of this sentencing will undoubtedly reverberate throughout Bankman-Fried’s life and shape the broader legal landscape concerning financial crimes and crypto.
